Guidelines for reducing stigma and discrimination and enhancing care and support for people living with HIV and AIDS
Produced with Technical Support from Training and
Research Support Centre (TARSC), Zimbabwe:
Naira Khan, Rene Loewenson
Financial support from SADC/EU Project on HIV and AIDS
Harare, November 2005
This document provides the guidelines commissioned by SANASO from Training and Research Support Centre (TARSC) Zimbabwe. The document is a final version incorporating inputs from a stakeholders meeting convened by SANASO on 25-26 October 2005. The meeting brought together members of faith based organizations, union and workplace representatives, organizations of PLWHA and media.
More than two decades have lapsed within which time the battle to improve the life of People Living with HIV and AIDS (PLWHA) has been marked by the advance in understanding of the epidemic and how to prevent its spread and treat its consequences, and by important steps to implement this understanding in service outreach. There do, however, continue to be numerous barriers to access to these services in Africa, including the negative effects of stigma and discrimination. Stigma and fear of discrimination have been found to negatively influence many community responses to the epidemic. If HIV is determined (or suspected) to be the cause of an illness, family and community members are reported to be less willing
to provide care and support1. The response to such fear and stigma has often been awareness activities aimed at both victim and perpetrator of stigma. These activities have sought to change attitudes towards groups who are being stigmatised and to the disease. However, the fact that stigma persists indicates that a more structural understanding of its causes needs to be built and that responses need to address determinants of stigma at their different levels.
Despite repeated programmatic and policy interventions to confront stigma, we
are thus still left with fundamental questions to unravel including:
• What is stigma?
• What are the causes of stigma and discrimination?
• Why does it persist despite increasing knowledge and awareness about HIV and AIDS?
The term stigma originated in ancient Greece where slaves and criminals were
branded to show that they were outcasts. Stigma can be experienced internally
(self stigma) or externally (discrimination). Internal stigma can lead to a person’s
unwillingness to seek help or access resources. External stigma can lead to
discrimination based on one’s perceived or actual HIV-positive status or on one’s
association with someone else with perceived or actual HIV-positive status.2 Thus
stigma can be seen as negative thoughts or prejudices about people from
particular groups or with certain characteristics.3 With respect to the HIV and AIDS pandemic, stigma is an enormous hurdle, which intrudes at all levels of
prevention and intervention. For example, stigma insidiously interferes with
programmatic efforts at an institutional level where employees may not utilize
benefits or resources in place to assist persons living with HIV and AIDS, health
workers may find it difficult to treat people and to assist them in managing and
coping with the situation. On a personal level, stigma may mean loneliness,
abandonment, ostracism, violence, starvation and death. In summary, the effects of stigma on in dividuals and the community include:
• Emotional stress and anxiety, depression, attempted suicide, isolation;
• Problems in family relationships and friendships;
• Increased inequities between those who are affected and those who are not;
• Increased disability;
• Concealment of the disease after diagnosis, leading to stress and anxiety;
• Poor prognosis;
• Participation restrictions (e.g., loss of job, economic dependency, inability to marry, lack of access to loans and credit) that may affect entire families and, in high prevalence areas, entire villages
• Increased psychological and psychiatric morbidity;
• Lack of motivation to continue treatment
• Empowerment (e.g. positive self-image and confidence) developed in resistance to discrimination (through participation in support groups for people living with HIV and AIDS).
Due to the issues that individuals suffer as a result of stigma, it is found that one of the biggest repercussions is the negative effect on heath care interventions.
Individuals often wait too long to access health care facilities and this may impact negatively on both the individuals’ health and the community as a whole. Some of the consequences of this factor have included:
• Delays in presentation fortreatment leading to prolonged transmission of the disease in the community;
• Poorer treatment prognosis; more complicated and more expensive treatment;
• Continued transmission of HIV
• Poor adherence and default on treatment;
• Risk of drug resistance;
• Increased burden on health services;
• Negative image of health program.
Research has provided some insights into the complexities of the issues. With respect to causes, some of the major ones, which have been highlighted, include incomplete knowledge, fears of death and disease, sexual norms and a lack of
recognition of stigma.4 Insufficient and inaccurate knowledge combined with fears of death and disease perpetuate beliefs in casual transmission and avoidance of those with HIV.5
Another major cause is the knowledge that HIV can be transmitted sexually immediately conjures up scenarios of immoral behaviour resulting in PLWHA being further stigmatized. Another important factor which was found in the above research was that the majority of people in their three country research expressed concern and compassion for those persons who are affected and infected by HIV and AIDS but simultaneously expressed words and actions that are stigmatizing. For example:
“One cannot be blamed because this disease is just like malaria nowadays, it is everywhere and everyone is committing adultery...We will not isolate this person if she or he comes back home because he didn’t want to settle...the father may step out of the family just once and get the disease then bring it home to his wife.”
(Participant in an FGD of rural women, Tanzania.).6
This participant is sending mixed messages: she is showing her compassion and also stigmatizing PLWHA by using stereotypic beliefs that people who commit adultery are those that contract the virus.
However, stigma is not simply a psychological response. It is also a means to responding to disease without challenging the conditions that cause it. A process takes place within communities where differences are labeled, given negative attributes, where the people are characterized as separated from the community (‘us from them’), causing loss and discrimination. Society needs to explain or control disease, and if flight from disease is not a realistic option, then blaming the victim is one response used as people seek to isolate and distance themselves from the problem. The negative impact of such a response is to make stigmatizedpeople responsible for taking action on their affliction, rather than society as a
whole. This can leave the underlying structural causes of the disease untouched,
as has been the case with females or adolescents. Stigma is thus a way of
sustaining power relations, despite the powerful force that disease can be to confronting them. Groups already ‘scapegoated’ for other reasons, including migrants, commercial sex workers, poor women, are more vulnerable to such
stigma. AIDS related stigma plays into and reinforces class, gender, sexual and racial inequalities in society This dissonance between social norms and reality undermines the support stigmatised people get from society7.
Socioeconomic status, age and gender are thus found to be factors that contextualize the experiences of individuals with respect to stigma. For example, poor people may face greater stigma because they have less money and resources to hide their status. Women may be blamed more than men as their infection with HIV challenges the standard family and reproduction-oriented sexual morality found in most societies. In the context of these norms, commercial sex workers are seen as the agents of infection and their clients as unwitting victims.
These and other factors have made the reduction of stigma a challenge to in the majority of environments and in particular in Southern Africa. Many of the above factors lead to self-stigmatization, involving feelings of guilt and fear among infected persons.
This document aims to provide guidelines on HIV and AIDS stigma reduction strategies for use by non-governmental organizations and the communities that they work with.
The guidelines cover four thematic areas:
i. Stigma and the Family;
ii. Stigma in Faith based organizations;
iii. Stigma in the Workplace;
iv. Stigma and the Media/communication.
The guidelines have been developed to contribute information to support organizations working to achieve the following results:
The guidelines were developed by reviewing good practices on stigma and discrimination in sub-Saharan Africa with the objective of providing a format which may be utilized by partners to plan intervention programs to suit their various environments. The rules or processes outlined in these guidelines haveappeared to work in other environments or countries and are a useful starting point for new programs. They can also be used to review existing programs to determine whether they adequately deal with stigma as an issue.
The Guidelines provide the basic template or stencil and it is up to the program planner to use them to suit the intervention required. It is important for organizations that are planning interventions to note that the impact they have on
reducing risk will demand a coordinated, comprehensive and multi-sectoral response to stigma that addresses the different environments where people live and work. There is little point, for example, in having a Workplace program which is very successful in reducing stigma and then letting employees return to a community that stigmatizes them or attend a Church where they are called sinners. All possible environments should be covered and partners in the area should try as much as possible to coordinate programs. In other words, if one organization works with the Media and another only has resources to work with Workplaces etc, look for gaps and then intervene. This co-ordination may avoid resources being wasted in duplicating existing programs and ensure that different environments are addressed and that all organizations and communities play a coordinated role in reducing stigma associated with HIV and AIDS.
Program implementers should thus be aware of the areas raised in these guidelines and trained in options to address stigma raised in the guidelines before beginning interventions. In using these guidelines the role of PLWHA is central. As in any activity related to HIV and AIDS, understanding current situations, designing interventions and planning responses to HIV and AIDS calls for involvement of PLWHA in the various stages outlined in a meaningful way. Participants to the October 2005 SANASO meeting reviewing these guidelines noted that programs for the‘Greater Involvement of PLWHA’ (GIPA) should be known as the GEIPA program - Greater Empowerment and Involvement of People living with HIV and AIDS.
There are some general lessons learned from prior interventions that have had some positive results in reducing HIV and AIDS stigma:
i. Stigma and the Media/communication.
ii. Stigma in the Workplace;
iii. Stigma in Faith based organizations;
iv. Stigma and the Family;
The power of the media cannot be underestimated. We have witnessed the role the media plays in providing information and influencing social change. In Africa, despite variable levels of literacy and access to print information and highly unequal access to digital media, there has been a growth in the number of TV stations, radio stations, satellite television and internet. The role of the media in combating the HIV epidemic has not been fully assessed. Past research has found that the greater access Africans have to the media and to accurate information about contraception, the more likely they are to use family planning techniques. 17 However the other side of the coin was also revealed when uncritical media reporting of the supposed AIDS treatment with Kemron in the late 1980s influenced people into believing that AIDS was not a problem and dampened responses.
There are five aspects of the role of the media, which are outlined below in the quest to eradicate HIV and AIDS. 18
An ethical approach to a subject is the one intended to result in least harm and greatest good. An ethical approach to HIV and AIDS, whether from the media, the medical profession or the public at large aims to achieve a reduction in numbers of people infected with HIV, access to effective treatment for AIDS and supportive responses to mitigate the consequences of AIDS on individuals, families and communities. Ethics apply to all workplaces equally but the media has more influence. Thus, informing of the status of an individual in the media has more far reaching consequences than if a doctor revealed it to another doctor.
Reporting on HIV/AIDS is very challenging due to the numerous variables, which may contribute to shaping the final copy. Variables, which may ultimately detract from the important issues at hand and may include:
Reporters themselves may hinder good reporting by not spending enough time researching and investigating various viewpoints and by being misled by overoptimistic press releases which are totally removed from the reality of people’s lives. Reporters can also be influenced in their writings by their own personal biases and attitudes. For example, they may distrust spokespersons for PLWHA as wanting to attract money or male reporters may have the attitude that violence against women is justified under certain circumstances. Below are some
Ethical reporting of HIV and AIDS requires that the confidentiality of those with the virus and their family and friends, be respected. Identities and addresses should not be revealed or hinted at without their permission and reporters should not pressurize people with HIV into revealing their identities. Information given in confidence should never be passed and made accessible to others, inside or outside the media. 19
Using Language that does not communicate stigma
Ethical reporting of HIV/AIDS requires that the media use language and ask questions that reduce or avoid stigma and where possible, reduce or avoid reporting the negative attitudes of others to the disease.
The use of language has been found to be a very important means to molding and reflecting our attitudes. Words often carry emotions that encourage a positive or negative response. The response the reporter receives may not be the one wanted, thus, it is recommended that the language used be as far as possible, neutral of emotion. The following principles are recommended by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) 20 in their Guidelines for reporting HIV/AIDS:
Treatment and ‘cures’
Ethical reporting of HIV and AIDS requires that all claims of effective treatment, from whatever source, be subject to scrutiny, balance and reported uncritically.
Balance means giving due weight to the story and covering all aspects, including media, social, political, economic and other issues. Balance also means highlighting positive stories where appropriate, without underplaying the fact that HIV and AIDS is a serious crisis.
Ethical reporting of HIV and AIDS requires that media professionals do not repeat misconceptions or report irrelevant controversies such as the origin of the disease. If members of the public, or experts, are quoted repeating misconceptions, their words should be refuted by corrective quotes from national or international experts.
Ethical reporting of HIV and AIDS requires research into and reporting of issues that result in long-term improvement in care and prevention. This means that media should be less preoccupied by short-term credit to individuals or institutions than by the long-term community benefit of what they are reporting. Media should hold decision makers and policy makers accountable for their handling of the epidemic, including government, pharmaceutical industry and advocacy groups.
Media reporting on HIV and AIDS need to build an understanding of the unequal relations between men and women that exist in every society and the distorted perspective of the epidemic that result. In reporting on issues, the link between gender and poverty should be explored in analysis of situations. Wherever possible, media professionals should be trained in gender issues and take care to ensure that reports present a perspective, which accurately represents the experience of both men and women. Journalists should be aware of and seek out the gender dimensions of all aspects of the epidemic across the spectrum of prevention to treatment and care, as this will add to the depth and context of reporting and reveal new areas for media attention.
The rights of children have particular importance in the context of the epidemic. Particular care should be taken in reporting on children as they are experiencing the most extreme consequences of the epidemic and their rights to privacy should be afforded even greater protection. The identity of children should be protected and only revealed if the public interests are overwhelming. The latter should only be done if no harm is foreseeable and if they and any parents or guardians have given informed consent. Journalists should ensure that the concerns of children are covered by upholding their right to participate and be heard.
Voices and images of people living with HIV and AIDS
There is need to ensure that the voices and images of people living with and affected by HIV and AIDS are heard and seen in the media.. Special care should be taken to highlight the human face of the pandemic, with diverse voices including women, men, vulnerable and marginalized people.
Minority groups within a society should be treated with respect in media reporting on HIV and AIDS.. Those who are particularly vulnerable to HIV should be described as such and not as potential sources of infection for the broader community.
Media has a role to play in an open and respectful discussion of sexual issues, taking cultural norms into account but also being aware of where these are positively or negatively linked to stigma. This implies avoiding amplifying those norms that are associated with stigma and reinforcing those that reduce stigma.
In summary, editors and journalists can pay attention to the following issues in reviewing media reporting on HIV and AIDS. These questions were endorsed by the Southern African Editors Forum (SAEF) and Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA) to provide guidance to media councils, training institutions and media companies, as well as individual editors and journalists:
The workplace is a very important environment within which to address issues of stigma and discrimination. This is due to the fact that the majority of those infected are in their prime productive period. The use of knowledge of a person’s status to discriminate against them with respect to recruitment, promotion and staff development opportunities has been reported across the region. This has consequences for the individual, their family and the workplace. The family will find it difficult to access healthcare, nutrition, shelter and education if the breadwinner loses employment. The workplace may experience direct losses due to lost skills and recruitment costs, but also indirect consequences in worsening industrial relations, loss of workplace trust and job insecurity. This may lead to people avoiding companies that carry out such practices. To deal with these issues in line with fair labour standards and public health ethics, the Southern African Development community (SADC) and countries in the SADC region have developed a policy and set regulations on AIDS at the workplace that outline fair labour standards. The SADC guidelines on HIV and AIDS and Employment and national regulatory provisions are thus essential background reading for any workplace practitioner aiming to deal with stigma. Further, the International Labour Organisation (ILO) has also set up guidelines on workplace practices that provide guidance in this area. These references are cited in the useful reading materials at the end of this section. Despite the presence of such laws and policies, in the rapidly changing environment with increased labour flexibility, retrenchments and restructuring, many workers are not aware of their rights, many may face discrimination, illegal testing and dismissal because of their HIV status. 22 The role of trade unions in the struggle against the epidemic has been crucial, but also limited and insufficient.
In general, the following strategies have been effective in combating workplace HIV/AIDS related stigma and discrimination.
The International Labour Organisation (ILO) and SADC codes noted above provide guidelines on developing HIV and AIDS workplace policies and programs using consultation between employers and employees. They stress the importance of involving workers in policy development as it encourages discussion around the issues of denial, disclosure, stigma and discrimination. Also stressed is that stigma mitigation cannot be confined to a single campaign but requires to be integrated into a range of ongoing activities in the workplace. In summary both codes try to address the following issues:
The following are six key components recommended by the SADC code which would form an effective workplace policy.
4. Job Status. The status of a person should not be a factor in selection, promotion, training and transfer.
5. Managing illness and job security. The code states that employees should be entitled to all the benefits available without discrimination. If an employee becomes too ill to perform her/his agreed duties because of AIDS, the standard benefits and conditions and standard procedures for termination of service for comparable life threatening conditions should apply without discrimination.
6. Protection against victimization. The code recommends that PLWHA should be protected from stigmatization and discrimination by coworkers, employers and clients. It recommends that workplaces have workers committees and staff associations that arrange discussion groups where people can be open about their HIV status and discuss how they coped with the disclosure.
The basic principles for reduction of stigma at the workplace are outlined below and are drawn from practices currently being implemented in Southern Africa. Workplaces that have implemented successful stigma reduction have.
PLWHA employees and thus assist to destigmatize the disease. The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) has been advocating for the principle of Greater Involvement of People Living with HIV/AIDS (GIPA) in the workplace. The UNDP declares that;
“People living with and affected by HIV/AIDS should share the lead and responsibility in responding to the epidemic, while encouraging society to create a space for them to play this role...no community, government or institution can alleviate the impact of HIV/AIDS without embracing those infected or affected.”
The GIPA principle has been implemented in many workplaces in South Africa with great success. The success of the model is dependant on a number of factors outlined below.
a) Visibility of and disclosure from PLWHA... By involving PLHWA, workplace programs have had greater credibility, to have been more likely to address the concerns of employees and finally to motivate stigma mitigation.
b) The ongoing support of management to a workplace HIV and AIDS program. 27
c) Messages challenging HIV and AIDS stigma integrated into ongoing communications in the workplace, in order to ensure a long term effect on group attitudes and opinions.
d) Attitudes to HIV and AIDS influenced through horizontal rather than vertical channels.
e) Support groups for PLWHA employees provided, run by professionally trained facilitators. Support groups should include employees who are infected and affected by HIV and AIDS.
f) A sufficient number of well trained peer educators, with good interpersonal skills and well trained in basic facts to pass on their knowledge to employees.
g) Improved employee benefits, especially for health care, pensions and orphans. In the earlier discussed case of the Ministry of Public Service and Administration of South Africa, employee benefits were improved to assist staff members affected and infected by HIV and AIDS. This included improved funeral benefits, pensions for orphans, restructuring of pensions for spouses, and an extension of the previously narrow definition of spouse for government employees.
h) Monitoring all HIV and AIDS interventions to ensure their sensitivity to stigma and that they do not inadvertently increase stigmatization.
Faith based organizations (FBOs) are amongst the many institutions in society that shape the values and attitudes that guide responses to illness and vulnerability and that support appropriate and compassionate responses to social changes.
FBOs are increasingly establishing support initiatives to assist households affected by HIV/AIDS and play a major role in supporting those who are extremely poor. Over 90% of Churches and Mosques surveyed in a six-country study had activities to support orphans and vulnerable children, extended to community members “on the basis of need and not creed” 30 . Religious beliefs and organizations have provided psychological support and comfort to PLWHA and their families and religious values have been used to encourage non-stigmatizing behaviours. One of the often-quoted principles is the one of not judging the behaviour of others based on the premise that it is the role of God to pass judgment, not the role of people. The spiritual comfort provided by FBOs has helped to reduce the guilt that PLWHA may feel. It is however important to note that religious beliefs may also underlie social norms that lead to stigma. For example, beliefs that proscribe woman’s roles may lead to stigma against women with HIV and AIDS. FBOs thus have an important role in promoting religious beliefs that confront stigma, and encouraging dialogue on those that do not.
Experience from existing work by FBOs indicate that they can:
Anglicanism, Islam and Catholism all have their own rationales for their support or prohibition of condoms. Anglicans in Uganda view condoms as an HIV prevention mechanism, only to be utilized in good Christian marriages. Muslims justify the use of condoms through Qur’anic passages, whereby it is reasoned that the sanctity of life is greater than the sin of condom use. Catholics also value the sanctity of life but see condoms as preventing the creation of life through its function as a contraceptive. In most programs in Uganda the Catholic Church will not comment on or condemn the use of condoms.
Many FBOs have used a two-pronged program, which intervenes at two levels namely theological reflection and practice. 33 In many communities FBOs provide the majority of HIV and AIDS related services such as counseling, education, health care, care for orphans and home based care.
Theological reflection has involved discussions on the implications of HIV and AIDS for religions and unpacking the issues around sex and responsible sexuality.
FBOs can utilize Theological Reflection to address stigma, through
The second component of the FBO program has been to provide palliative care for those who are ill, to have a program to build the capacities of the leaders so that they may respond to the pandemic in a non stigmatizing way. Another important aspect of this level of intervention is to provide some activities with a preventative component.
FBOs may also play a role in raising awareness and responding to fears. This involves educating members of the congregation about HIV and AIDS transmission and living positively. FBOs differ in their message with respect to the use of condoms as there is some variability, due to the assumption that it encourages immoral sexual behaviour. Information should also be provided, to reduce fears amongst the membership on transmission of the virus.
Finally, FBOs may run Support groups and encourage the full participation of PLWHA at all levels of the hierarchy. It is very important for FBOs to provide a safe place for PLWHA to disclose the status without being stigmatized and to look forward to some help and support from fellow members. In South Africa it has been found that when Church leadership disclose their status to other members, impact has been perceived to be very motivating for others in the congregation. 35
Stigma within the family or directed towards an affected family is usually the most difficult to strategize for. This is due to the fact that the family has many complex relationships which all come into play when dealing with issues of stigma. By inhibiting open communication, stigma makes disclosure in the family very difficult. Sex and sexuality are already issues that are seldom addressed within the context of the African family, thus, stigma around HIV and AIDS is particularly intense because it concerns the already taboo subjects of sex and death and because the virus is transmitted from one person to the other. 36
Stigma is socially constructed and reinforces existing prejudices in society such as sex workers, persons with alternative sexuality etc. In the family context it is usually women who bear the brunt of the burden of stigma, especially pregnant women and mothers. 37 Gender and gender relations are very important variables to consider when strategizing reducing stigma due the following complexities:
Dealing with stigma within the family thus demands interventions that address gender equity at numerous levels and that increase sensitivity to gender issues.
Children both stigmatize and experience stigma. One of the most common forms of stigma experienced by children affected by AIDS is teasing and social isolation by peers. This suggests that children absorb the societal attitudes towards AIDS at an early stage and it is very important to include them in interventions at an early stage. A number of child-centered approaches have been developed and they have been very successful in the following ways:
Child Centered Approaches include the use of memory boxes or books, psychosocial support and life skills training.
The Regional consultation on stigma and HIV and AIDS, Dar-es- Salaam, Tanzania, June 200246 prioritized the following key responses to stigma within families and communities.
Research conducted in Southern and Eastern Africa has identified the following needs among families caring for people with HIV and AIDS. Most families are compassionate and caring but stigma often makes the expression of this compassion difficult. The following guidelines can be used to support families and reduce stigma in the home. Programs should involve all family members, particularly men, to encourage greater sharing of the burden of care within the household. 47
1 Nyblade L, Field-Nguer ML. (2001) Women, communities, and the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV: issues and findings from community research in Botswana and Zambia. International Centre for Research on Women, Washington
2 Policy Project/South Africa; Centre for the study of AIDS, University of Pretoria; USAID; and Chief Directorate; HIV/AIDS&TB, Department of Health.2003. Siyam’kela: Measuring HIV/AIDS Related Stigma, HIV Stigma Indicators: A Tool for Measuring the progress of HIV/Aids Stigma Mitigation,p.5.
3 Safaids and Healthlink Worldwide (2002) Southern African HIV/AIDS Action Issue 53 July-September 2002.
4 International Center for Research on Women (2003) Disentangling HIV and AIDS Stigma in Ethiopia, Tanzania and Zambia..
7 Bond V (2002) The dimensions and wider context of HIV/AIDS stigma and resulting discrimination in southern Africa in Sisask A (ed) (200?) One step further - Responses to HIV/AIDS SIDA Studies no 7, SIDA/UNRISD, Elanders Novum AB, Gothenburg, Sweden pp 29-53
9 Siyam’kela: Measuring hiv/aids related stigma. Promising practice of stigma-mitigation efforts from across South Africa. Policy Project of South Africa, centre for the Study of AIDS, University of Pretoria, USAID and Chief Directorate, Dept of Health.
10 An Epidemic of Stigma and Discrimination: A Series of eight information sheets on HIV/AIDS and dA iscrimination: http:www.aidslaw.ca/maincontent/Issues/discrimination/e-info-da4.htm.
11 By the end of 2000, 55% of infected adults in sub- Saharan Africa were women Teenage girls in sub-Saharan Africa are infected at a rate five or six times higher than teenage boys UNIFEM, 2001. Turning the Tide.
12 By the end of 2000, 55% of infected adults in sub- Saharan Africa were women Teenage girls in sub-Saharan Africa are infected at a rate five or six times higher than teenage boys UNIFEM, 2001. Turning the Tide.
13 Feldman,R., Manchester,J. and Maposhere,C.(2000) Positive Women: Voices and Choices- Zimbabwe Report, ICW.
14 HIV/AIDS-Related Stigma and Discrimination: A Conceptual Framework and an Agenda for
Action. Horizons Program. www.popcouncil.org/horizons/horizons.html.
16 Issues arise at these different levels: for example: Are the laws and policies at the national leveland organizational level recognizing the rights of PLWHA? Are there effective policies in place to enforce prevention, care and treatment activities for those infected and affected by HIV and AIDS? At organizational level, is staff trained? Are there opportunities for factual information sharing, individual and group counseling? Do employees know what policies and procedures exist within organizations for accessing resources for treatment? Are the organizational policies with respect to PLWHA accessible? Are the procedures for obtaining benefits supportive, confidential and quick?
17 Westhoff, Charles F. and Bankole, A. (1997) Mass Media and Reproductive Behaviour in Africa Macro International Inc. Calverton, MD, USA.
18 Hanefield, Johanna (2005) ‘HIV/AIDS and the Media: A Global Perspective’ in Secrets and Lies? The ethics of HIV/AIDS Reporting in South Africa. A Report of an HIV/AIDS Indaba hosted at the Nelson Mandela Foundation in partnership with the HIV/AIDS and the Media Project, 1st February 2005.
19 All ethical guidelines adapted from, UNESCO (2000) Media and HIV/AIDS in East and Southern Africa: A resource book
20 IBID, 9.
21 IBID, 9.
22 COSATU(2000) Submission on HIV/AIDS Treatment, Care and Support, Presented to the Health Portfolio Committee.
23 World AIDS Campaign 2002-2003: A Conceptual Framework and Basis for Action: HIV/AIDS Stigma and Discriminations. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS: (UNAIDS) UNICEF, UNDP, UNDCP, ILO, UNESCO, WHO, WORLDBANK.
24 Hoffman v SAA, 2001(1) SA (CC).
25 Siyam’kela (2003) Measuring HIV/AIDS related Stigma: Promising Practice of stigma-mitigation efforts across South Africa. Policy project, South Africa; Centre for the study of AIDS, University of Pretoria; United States Agency for International Development and Chief Directorate HIV/AIDS&TB, Department of Health.
28 Siyam’kela (2003) Measuring HIV/AIDS related Stigma: Promising Practice of stigma-mitigation efforts across South Africa. Policy project, South Africa; Centre for the study of AIDS, University of Pretoria; United States Agency for International Development and Chief Directorate HIV/AIDS&TB, Department of Health.
30 Foster G (2005) Community safety nets for orphans and vulnerable children, UNRISD / TARSC research programme on Community Responses to AIDS, Mimeo Zimbabwe 2005.
31 Siyam’kela (2004) Promising Practice of Stigma Mitigation efforts from across Africa. Policy Project, South Africa; Centre for the study of AIDS, University of Pretoria; USAID and Chief Directorate: HIV/AIDS & TB, Department of Health.
32 Hogle, J., ed. What happened in Uganda? Declining HIV prevalence, behaviour change, and the national response. USAID, 2000. www.usaid.gov/pop_health/aids/Countries/africa/uganda_report.pdf.
35 International Centre for Research on Women (2003) Disentangling HIV and AIDS Stigma in Ethiopia, Tanzania and Zambia.
36 Baby Steps (2005) Reporting on the Mother to Child Transmission of HIV (PMTCT). An HIV/AIDS Indaba hosted at the Nelson Mandela Foundation in partnership with HIV/AIDS and the Media Project.
38 Berer, Marge and Ray, Sunanda (1993) Women and HIV/AIDS: An internationa Resource Book. London, Pandora Press.
40 Dunkle, Jewkes etal, (2003), cited in Baby Steps (2005) Reporting on the Mother to Child Transmission of HIV (PMTCT). An HIV/AIDS Indaba hosted at the Nelson Mandela Foundation in partnership with HIV/AIDS and the Media Project.
42 Deadline for Health: The Media’s Response to covering HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria in Africa. International Women’s Media Foundation and African Women’s Media Centre, September,
43 Southern Africa HIV/AIDS Action Issue 55, March 2003. Safaids and Healthlink.
44 Planning our future: A booklet for families and communities. Safaids and JSI ( UK), 2004.
46 Southern Africa HIV/AIDS Action Issue 53, July-September 2002. SAFAIDS and Healthlink. Nyablade, Laura et al(2003) Disentangling HIV and AIDS STIGMA in Ethiopia, Tanzania and Zambia. 47 International Centre for Research on Women.
Consultative Meeting/Workshop to Review and Finalize SANASO Guidelines on reducing HIV/AIDS Stigma and Discrimination in the Family, Faith Based Organizations, the Workplace and Media & Communication, Cresta Oasis Hotel, Harare, Zimbabwe, 24 & 25 October 2005
1. Mr. Zolani Kraii, Mochudi Support Group, C/o BONEPWA, P.O. Box 20744, Gaborone,
Tel: 267-3906224/71498142, Fax: 267-3190977, email: email@example.com
2. Reverend Ntseleng Merriam Mankga, Botswana Council of Churches, P.O. Box 355, Gaborone, Tel: 267- 3951981/72550727, Fax: 267-3951981, email: bots.Christ.firstname.lastname@example.org
3. Mr. Windros Kwenda, Botswana Federation of Trade Unions, Postal Staff - Jwaneng,
Tel: 267-5880202 (work) Tel: 267-5882568/71659574, email: email@example.com (administrator at BFTU)
4. Mr. Tiro Kganela, Journalists Against HIV/AIDS Botswana, P.O. Box 301118 Gaborone,
Tel: 267-3658034 Cell: 267-72641228, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
5. Ms. Ellen Mhone, NAPHAM, P. O. Box 355, Lilongwe,
Tel: 265-1-770641, Fax: 265-1-770803
6. Mr. Ndaona Vincent Mayaya, MANASO, P. O. Box 2916, Blantyre,
Tel: 265-1-635018/46, Fax: 265-1621984, email: email@example.com/ firstname.lastname@example.org
7. Ms. Emma Matinga, Malawi Business Coalition Against AIDS, P. O. Box 32221, Blantyre, Tel: 265-1-677375, email: email@example.com / firstname.lastname@example.org
8. Mr. Edward Kankhomba, Power 101 F.M Radio, Box 716, Blantyre,
Cell: 265-9-512699, Edward@journalist.com
9. Mr. Amos Tjombonde, St John Hollyness Church, Box 60154, Katutura, Windhoek,
Tel: 264-61-222314, Fax: 264-61-228731, email: email@example.com
10. Mr. Andre Orange, Namibia National Teachers Union, Box 61009, Katutura, Windhoek, Tel: 264-61-262247, Fax: 264- 61-261926, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
11. Ms. Alwina Awases, Khomas Women in Development. Box 7061, Katutura, Windhoek,
Tel: 264-61-218723, Fax: 264- 61-265893, email: email@example.com
12. Mr. Jan Mosegathebe, Parents Living with AIDS (PAWA), Johannesburg,
13. Ms. Ivy Platjies, Eyesizwe, Johannesburg, Tel: 27-11-6887684,
14. Ms. Thandie Khundla, NAPWA, P. O. Box 66 Germiston 1400, Johannesburg,
Tel: 27-11-2556400, Fax: 27-11-2556415,
Cell: 27-83-2066291, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
15. Mr. Ernst Kabulansando, Tikondane Home Based Care Project, P. O. Box 510332, Lusaka, Tel: 260-6-221453, Fax: 260-6-221453, email: email@example.com
16. Mrs. Costance Njovu, Anglican Diocese of Lusaka-HATBM Department, P. O. Box 30183, Lusaka, Tel: 260-1-262081/96- 436617, Fax: 260-1-256790, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
17. Mr. Eric Mwanza, Zambia Business Coalition, P. O. Box 31026, Lusaka,
Tel: 260-1-220801-2, Fax: 260-1-224561, email: email@example.com
18. Ms. Joyce Sata, Zambia Daily Mail, P. O. Box 31421, Lusaka,
Tel: 260-1-221364, Fax: 260-1-221364, email: joycesata@G.mail.com
19. Mr. Benjamin Mazhindu, ZNNP+, 28 Divine Road, Milton Park, Harare,
Cell: 263-11 779980, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
20. Ms. Blessing Ncube, Jesuit AIDS, 37 Admiral Tait Road, Marlborough, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-300811, Fax: 263-4-300028, email: email@example.com
21. Mr. Comfort Rudzuna, ZAPSO, 4 Arbedine Road, Avondale, Harare,
Tel: 263-4735025, Fax: 263-4-735025, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
22. PSI, 30 The Chase West, Emerald Hill Office Park,
Tel: 263-4-334631, Fax: 263-4-339632, email: email@example.com
Participants invited by SANASO Secretariat
23. Fortune Banga, Federation of African Media Women, 102 Samora Machel Ave West, Harare, Tel: 263-4-770480/756466 Fax: 263-4-771071
24. Mr. Denford Madhinha, Save The Children Fund - UK, 10 Natal Road, Belgravia, Harare, Tel: 263-4-727508/708200 Fax: 263-4-708200, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
25. Ms. Caroline Mubaira, Community Working Group on Health, Eastlea, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-788134, Fax: 263-4-788134
26. Dr. T Magura, Director, National AIDS Council, 100 Central Avenue, Harare,
27. Ms. Linile Malunga, Save The Children - Norway, 184 Fife Avenue,
P. O. Box 4581, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-721541/795472 Fax: 263-4-796535, email: email@example.com
28. Ms. Gladys Chiwome, Women AIDS Support Network (WASN), P. O. Box 1554, Harare, Tel: 263-4-791401/2/4, Fax:263-4-791401, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
29. The Herald, Herald House, P. O. Box 396, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-795771/704376, Fax: 263-4-791311/796375
30. Mr. Masimba Mbiriwasha, Zimbabwe AIDS Network, No. 154 Samora Machel Ave, West Belvedere, Harare, Tel: 263-4- 775520, Fax: 263-4-710116, email: email@example.com
31. Rouzeh Eghtessadi, SAfAIDS, 17 Beveridge Road, Avondale, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-336193-4, Fax: 263-4-336195, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
32. Zimbabwe Council of Church, 128 Mbuya Nehanda Street, P. O. Box 3566, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-748235/772043, Fax: 263-4-773650, Email: email@example.com
33. Mr. Ezrek Hweru, Employment Council of Zimbabwe, P. O. Box 158, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-739633/47/49, Fax: 263-4- 739630
34. Ms. Elizabeth Shoko, TARSC, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-705108/334829, Fax: 263-4-334829
35. Ms. Loveness, Zimbabwe Media Monitoring Project, P. O. Box 6460, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-793289, Fax: 263-4-793289, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
36. Toendepi Dhure, Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Union, P. O. Box 3549, Harare,
37. Mr. Jimmy Wilford, National Coordinator, SAYWHAT, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-788134, Fax: 263-4-788134
38. Jabusile Shumba, SAYWHAT, Midlands State University, Gweru
39. Sendisa Ndlovu, SAYWHAT, University of Zimbabwe, Harare,
40. Ms. Spiwe Marufu, SAYWHAT, Morgan Zintech Teachers College, Harare
41. Ms. Vimbai Mhlambo, SAYWHAT, Belvedere Technical Teachers College, Harare
42. Mrs. Magede, Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Union, P. O. Box 3549, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-781876/9, Fax: 263-4-728484, email: email@example.com
43. Mr. Charles Kasvosve, Public Service Union for Civil Servants, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-792542, Fax: 263-4-704971
44. Rev. Ignatius Zimbeva, Zimbabwe Network of Religious leaders Living with HIV/AIDS (ZINERELA+), Harare, Zimbabwe
45. Mr. Douglas Mutanga SANASO Board Member for Zimbabwe, Harare
46. Dr. Rene Loewenson, TARSC, 47 Van Praah Avenue, Milton Park, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-705108/795124, Fax: 263-4- 737220, email: firstname.lastname@example.org / email@example.com
47. Ms. Naira Khan, TARSC, 47 Van Praah Avenue, Milton Park, Harare,
Tel: 263-4-705108/795124, Fax: 263-4-737220, email: firstname.lastname@example.org / email@example.com
48. Ms. M. Mohale, SADC HIV & AIDS Unit, P. Bag 0095, Gaborone, Botswana,
Tel: 267-3951863, Fax: 267-3972848, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
E C Official
49. Mr. Chihera, EU House, 1 Nordfolk Road, Mouth Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe,
Tel: 263-4-338158-164, Fax: 263-4- 338165, email:
50. Farai Mugweni, P. O. Box 6690, Harare, Zimbabwe,
Tel: 263-4-745748, Cell: 263-11-409298, Fax: 263-4-745749, email: email@example.com
51. Tapiwanashe Hoto, P. O. Box 6690, Harare, Zimbabwe,
Tel: 263-4-745748, Cell: 263-91-422327, Fax: 263-4-745749, firstname.lastname@example.org
52. Mex Chimika, P. O. Box 6690, Harare, Zimbabwe,
Tel: 263-4-745748, Cell: 263-11-419584, Fax: 263-4-7457481
53. Josephine Mukoki, P. O. Box 6690, Harare, Zimbabwe,
Tel: 263-4-745748, Cell: 263-11-619698, Fax: 263-4-745749, email: email@example.com
Desclaimer: This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication is the sole responsibility of SANASO and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
Table of contents
2. The Guidelines
2.1Using the guidelines
2.2 Lessons from previous experiences
2.3 Useful Reading Material
3. Media Guidelines
3.1 The Role of the Media in the fight against HIV and AIDS
3.2 An Ethical Approach to HIV and AIDS reporting
3.3 Reviewing stories on HIV and AIDS
3.4 Useful Reading Material
4. Workplace Guidelines
4.1 Workplace Policy
4.2 Principles based on Good Practice on stigma Reduction at the workplace
4.3 Useful Reading Material
5. Guidelines for Faith-Based Organisations
5.1 Basic Principles for Faith-Based Organisations in developing strategies for reducing stigma
5.2 Guidelines to reduce stigma in Faith-based Organisations
5.3 Useful Reading Materials
6. Guidelines for Families
6.1 Gender Dynamics in the Family
6.2 Children and Youth
6.3 Principles for reducing stigma in the family